Eat Your Wheatlies

December 20th, 2017 at 10:00 AM ^

Definitely agree that he wouldn't take that role back at UM, but when should we expect a resolution (or confirmation of) to our offensive coaching staff assignments. Is it still considered likely or possible that either Drevno or Hamilton will not return? I'd assume we would find out shortly after the bowl game, but what are everyone's expectations?

Everyone Murders

December 20th, 2017 at 8:47 AM ^

Well, that's some good shit, Jedd.

(Congrats to Coach Fisch - even though he left us, I never felt that he did anything other than be up front about his aspirations.  Good to see the Harbaugh tree grow.)

MH20

December 20th, 2017 at 9:18 AM ^

I wouldn't expect him to spend any great deal of time there, maybe even just one season.  If record-setting QB Drew Lock returns to Mizzou, that offense will be prolific.  That could/should springboard Jedd to a head coaching position.  I don't think he would have that chance if he stayed at UCLA because of the offense clearly being Chip Kelly's baby and the perception that he'd just be a figurehead OC.

AZBlue

December 20th, 2017 at 9:07 AM ^

he was going to be much more than the OC in name only under Kelly or at least that would have been the perception. This gives him the potential to be seen as clearly “the guy”. I expect he will be looking for either a HC or NFL OC position in the next 1-2 years.

Magnus

December 20th, 2017 at 9:48 AM ^

The previous OC at Missouri turned the opportunity into a head coaching job at UCF. Missouri averaged 39 points/game (#10 in the country) and was #7 in total offense. They were better than UCLA in both categories and play in a tougher conference.

Don

December 20th, 2017 at 9:56 AM ^

I've got deep family roots at Missouri. My grandfather was a longtime physics prof there so my dad grew up in Columbia and eventually went to school at Mizzou. He met my mom while in school and my older sister went there as well. I spent many a pleasant (but fucking hot and humid) summer visit in Columbia, and I rooted for MIssouri football as early as I did Michigan football. 

I know it's not likely to happen anytime soon but I'd love to have Missouri in the BIG some day. Much rather have them than Rutgers. Or even maybe PSU.

jabberwock

December 20th, 2017 at 10:15 AM ^

I was begging everyone i could find (ok, only my cats) to have Missouri join the B1G.

Then they added fucking Rutgers and Mizzou wisely went $EC.

AFAIC there's always time to fix a past mistake.  If the conference ever expands again (without kicking out Rutgers) I'd love to lure Missouri and maybe  . .  Virginia?

Everyone Murders

December 20th, 2017 at 10:30 AM ^

I had this conversation with a group of friends (OK, only my dog), but with a different conclusion.

OUT WITH

  • Penn State, because they aided and abetted the rape of children and still are institutionally in denial mode.
  • Rutgers, because ... Rutgers.
  • Maryland, because of footprint and space.  They did not really do anything wrong (and add to the picture in MBB), but they go because it's my dream.

IN WITH

  • Texas, because tradition fits and academics are solid.
  • Georgia Tech, because academics and tradition fit.
  • Virginia, because academics fit and Charlottesville is awesome.

My hound agrees with me on all of this.  We also hate Notre Dame - like playing them, but fuck their "independent except when we don't wanna be" schtick.  They can bump UVa or GaTech if they go all-in.

PurpleBeaverEater

December 20th, 2017 at 10:49 AM ^

Notre Dame should be forced into joining a damn conference already. Bunch of Catholics who want to go against the grain to try to prove they are better than everyone else... But...you said Maryland due to footprint, yet added Texas? Maybe I misunderstood “footprint” to mean that they are far away from other B1G schools? Regardless, shaking up the conference to get rid of dead weight is something I am all for. Also, I just want to clarify that PSU was pro-child rape for years. They didn’t just harbor the persons responsible, they also allowed it to continue for years.

Everyone Murders

December 20th, 2017 at 11:40 AM ^

On Texas, I (and my dog) are willing to overlook the distance, because Austin rocks (literally) and Texas is a blue-blood program.  Maryland is fine, as in "yes dear, that dress looks fine on you" but is too far away given that they are anything but a blue-blood program. 

As far as Notre Dame goes, I think you overplay the Catholic angle.  First, BC and other Catholic schools don't play the "we're Catholic, we're special" angle.  Second, an ex-seminarian friend calls Notre Dame the "Disneyland of American Catholicism".  He's an ND grad twice-over, and still laughs at their culture from the religious side.

We have no quarrel on the PSU front.  I may have underemphasized it, but the heart of the "aiding and abetting" is worse even than what you wrote.  They didn't just turn a blind eye, but by giving Sandusky the keys to PSU facilities, they actually helped him groom and rape children.  I grieve first for the victims, next for the self-aware faculty, students, and fans who are rightly horrified not only by Sandusky's crimes but PSU's role in them.

And the Paternos and other JoePalogists(TM)?  Fuck each and every one of them that is still lionizing JoePa.

Kevin13

December 20th, 2017 at 10:50 AM ^

expand the footprint of the B1G.  I would rather see UNC added over a Georgia Tech. Would hate to play them in football every year because ot that damn triple option. Also UNC would add another great BB program to the conference. They are also decent in baseball and Softball.

Everyone Murders

December 20th, 2017 at 11:38 AM ^

My dog hates your idea.  She also hates skateboards, and thinks you probably were riding one when you wrote this.  She also hates vacuum cleaners, but can't really tie that to you.  I'll put it this way - her eyebrow is cocked your way.

(UNC is a bit tarnished in my book because they're so damned corrupt on the "student-athlete" front.  GaTech is legit in that respect, as is UVa.)

Mr Miggle

December 20th, 2017 at 12:31 PM ^

under future coaches? It makes sense for the academies, but GT is one of the top recruiting areas in the country. They should be able to recruit for any system and their offense puts a low ceiling on their recruiting. It can even hurt their recruiting on defense as good players usually like to join highly ranked classes.