Penn State 42, Michigan 13 Comment Count

Ace


A matchup problem. [Patrick Barron]

Michigan has weaknesses that playoff teams lack. Tonight, those weaknesses were brutally exposed by a Penn State squad that sure looked like a playoff team themselves.

This game looked all but over in the opening five minutes. On the second play from scrimmage, future Heisman winner Saquon Barkley shifted over to quarterback, ran a read option with quarterback Trace McSorley acting as the running back, and gutted Michigan for a 69-yard touchdown. The Wolverines, on the other hand, went backwards on their opening possession, then watched as Barkley finished off a four-play, 78-yard drive with a 15-yard touchdown off a speed option pitch. Michigan, again, had negative yardage on the following drive.

A miscommunication between McSorley and tight end Mike Gesicki resulted in a David Long interception that briefly gave the Wolverines new life. After marching down to the PSU three, it took four cracks for Karan Higdon to finally break the plane. Quinn Nordin, getting booed by a crowd that never forgets a slight, missed the extra point. Michigan's counterpunch brought the defense to life; Khaleke Hudson nearly picked off a screen pass in the end zone.

Also a matchup problem. [Eric Upchurch]

The teams traded punts until a flurry of action at the end of the half. First, an unlikely connection from John O'Korn to Kekoa Crawford set up a six-yard Ty Isaac touchdown to bring Michigan within a point. Then McSorley threw Penn State down the field in the blink of an eye before finishing the drive on a three-yard keeper.

While the Wolverines went into the half down only 21-13, the numbers were foreboding. PSU amassed 302 total yards in the first half, more than Michigan had allowed in a full game this season. The safeties, steady to this point, were exploited in space by Barkley and McSorley. The offense mustered only 141 yards on five fewer plays, still hampered by poor blocking and a lack of trust in the passing game.

Given all that, it probably shouldn't have surprised too many people when Penn State blew the game wide open in the second half. Issues new and old appeared on PSU's first possession of the half. Tyree Kinnel got dusted one-on-one by DaeSean Hamilton on a slant for 26 yards; Barkley dropped a big gain after easily beating Mike McCray on a wheel route; McSorley seemingly juked half the defense to find the end zone on a beautifully designed inverted veer that had Barkley motion before the snap, drawing much of the defense's attention. Just like that, PSU took a commanding 28-13 lead.


Once again, John O'Korn couldn't generate much in the passing game. [Upchurch]

From then on, it was a merciless beating. On offense, O'Korn was improved from last week's woeful outing but still only managed 5.9 yards per attempt. Any hopes of a comeback were dashed when cornerback Christian Campbell beat Karan Higdon around the edge and ripped the ball away from O'Korn. They were really dashed when Barkley toasted McCray in man coverage for a juggling 48-yard touchdown two plays later; McCray had no hope of keeping pace, yet the normally unassailable Don Brown kept allowing that matchup to play out. 

It was academic from there. McSorley added another rushing touchdown with 7:53 to play. Michigan's final possession ended in appropriately inept fashion. Facing fourth-and-nine, the coaches pulled right tackle Juwann Bushell-Beattly, who allowed consistent pressure, to insert Nolan Ulizio as an apparent pass-protection specialist. Before they could snap the ball, O'Korn took a delay of game. After the penalty, redshirt freshman backup Shaka Toney ran right around Mason Cole to sack O'Korn for the coup de gras.

Michigan can only fix so much this season. With the schedule letting up considerably over the next few week, they're likely to try some new patches, potentially including one fans have wanted for weeks. Quarterback Brandon Peters was warming up on the sideline before O'Korn ultimately took the field for M's last drive. Given how that drive played out, that was probably for the best. Now that the conference title is essentially out of reach and a top-ten defense isn't facing M's O-line, it's time to see what Peters has got. While that won't solve everything, it could be the spark this offense desperately needs.

Many of tonight's other issues will be taken care of for this year, at least, by not having to face Joe Moorhead and this Nittany Lions offense again.

They want Bama. They can have them.

Comments

Blue Know It

October 22nd, 2017 at 11:30 AM ^

You’re just impatient. Not everyone wins a NC in year 3 when turning a program around from the ground up. Not too long ago Clemson Nation wanted Dabo out. He didn’t even win 10 games till year 4! Thank god we have smarter people running our program and not aomeone as impatient as our fan base. To hear people actually call for JH’s job just baffles me. Get a grip people.

maizenbluenc

October 22nd, 2017 at 8:36 AM ^

the offense and specifically JoK played better than the last two weeks? The defense showed many cracks - maybe game plan, maybe minor injuries - but Michigan looked better to me. Penn State is just a whole lot older with something to prove after being dissed over OSU last year. They are where we were last year. Now let's see how the refs screw them in Columbus.

SHub'68

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:39 PM ^

the only one. I admit I may not have a clue, but I think until the landslide happened, O'Korn and the offense played good enough to win last night if the defense had been anything resembling previous games. The defense completely baffles me. I thought PSU would get theirs because they ARE a good team, but to get torched over and over again. Not sure what to make of what I saw. Maybe they just had a bad game?

Polyanna

October 22nd, 2017 at 11:06 AM ^

He let Jedd Fisch go which was a huge mistake.  He was running the offense not Drevno.  JH is showing too much loyalty to Drevno who needs to be replaced.  

I'm also concerned about the defense blitzing against PSU.  With their offense wwe should have kept the linebackers in place to defend against Barkley and McSorley.  Instead of sending everyone.  It left that slant pass open all game.  It looked bad.  Against weaker teams that might work but not when you're playing a talented and season duo like #26 and #9!

Gulogulo37

October 22nd, 2017 at 2:10 AM ^

I never thought he was a terrible coach. Everyone including Brian were making way too much out of one mistake. Brian probably still thinks State is gonna go 6-6 this year like he predicted after we lost to them.

1VaBlue1

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:16 AM ^

No.

Yes, he played better in this game than he did against either MSU or IU.  But he still isn't an answer, so much as a place holder at QB.  Time to see what Peters can do.  It may not be better immediately, but the upside is far better.  There is a crapload of offense missing from the passing game, and its because JOK can't handle it.  I'll applaud his effort, but more upside is needed...

TrueBlue2003

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:25 AM ^

in this game.  And that's just a sad indictment of everyone else.

He was pretty solid though. Was vicimized by some drops (DPJ, Gentry), and was much more decisive about pulling it down and running when he needed to.

That said, we're now playing for next year and he's not gonna be here next year, so I think you have to go with Peters even if he is worse.

TrueBlue2003

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:56 AM ^

because those were just the easy ones that I recall. Again, JOK looked solid, especially in the first half.  Despite heavy pressure, stepped up and made some first downs with his legs.  The throw to Crawford was pretty.  And the 24 yarder that was called back for a holding was nice too.

He missed his checkdown on the sack on the first drive, but it probably wouldn't have been good for a first down anyway. He waited too long to hit Evans on the 3 and 3 checkdown that got 2 yards on the 3-and-out in the second quarter, but as far as I know, those were the only mistakes in the first half.

He engineered two TD drives out of only five drives in the first half (not counting the final one that we gave up on after the holding call), which was something I would have taken in a heartbeat.

First play of second drive, DPJ drops the screen pass on first.  Then stumbles on the third down.  Defense gives up another TD, we get sacked, and sacked and sacked again to end the game, most of which were not JOKs fault.

mgoblue98

October 22nd, 2017 at 3:06 AM ^

thought the drops by Perry were almost uncatchable at the time.  I would like to see them again.  The WR screen pass that DPJ dropped looked like a play that was going to go for big yards.  The drop by Hill was going to go for no yards.  Still, gotta catch the ball.

Gulogulo37

October 22nd, 2017 at 6:39 AM ^

They could have been better but not uncatchable. Space Coyote had a good point on the first Perry drop. Perry tried to basket catch it, but it would have been easier if he had flipped his hands. We could probably use a WR coach...

CLord

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:16 AM ^

You don't get it man.  Last year there were tons of RPS designs that exploited defenses.  This year there are none.  None.  We might be really good next year, but only with a new OC.  Can't believe how much I miss Jedd Fish. Otherwise road games at MSU and OSU loom next year so another 8-4 campaign looms.

1VaBlue1

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:22 AM ^

Apparently, you don't get it, either.  You do realize that Drevno was the OC last year, too?  Do you also realize that last years OL was filled with upper classmen?  And that they were only asked to gap block?  And that the WRs and RB were seniors?  And that Drevno was still the OC?  And that the entire offense was open for each game?  Do you realize that (probably) 90% of the passing offense was shelved because the backup QB can't handle it?

You're an idiot...

TrueBlue2003

October 22nd, 2017 at 12:32 AM ^

You don't get it either.  Too much blame on the QB.  The OL is horrific at pass pro.  Just abysmal.  It's a revolving door at RT, our interior guys struggle with stunts, blitzes, and strong breezes.

Our receivers are injured and/or can't run routes, and/or can't catch the ball.

And yes, our QB doesn't go through his progressions well, but he doesn't have time to anyway, that's why when the QB that was pretty good last year played behind this line, he was far worse than he was last year, and then got injured 3.3 games into the season because of course he did.

TrueBlue2003

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:03 AM ^

the OL situation is almost certain to be worse, because the replacements for Cole and Kugler probably will be downgrades and that probbaly won't be offset by improvements by Bredeson and Onwenu.  It's going to be a very shaky line once again (way to bring in only three guys in all of 2016!).

QB is going to be Speight so it'll be average, maybe slightly above average again.

We lose Hurst, which should be offset by improvements by the safeties but our defense probably isn't going to be better.

And the schedule is BRUTAL with road trips to ND, MSU and OSU and home games against Wisconsin and PSU. Depending on Nebraska's next coach, that could be losable.  Oh, and we travel to Northwestern which might be losable.  Four losses there. Three at best.

2019 should be the year though.  The 2017 OL class should be really good, not to mention senior Bredeson and Onwenu. The WRs should be really good by then.  And between Peters and McCaffrey, we have to have a good QB, right?

TrueBlue2003

October 22nd, 2017 at 2:08 AM ^

individual downgrade, but if he's equal to Kugler, that'd be impressive for a second year guy. I don't know how many times around here people think a second year offensive lineman will be good because he was a high recruit and then are surprised when he is not good. Which means collectively the LT and C will almost certainly be worse next year than our current LT and C. 

Cole has been great in run blocking and yeah, just ok in pass pro, but who is taking that job next year?  One of JBB or Ulizio?  More likely a RS freshman, which is going to be worse than Senior Mason Cole with 97% certainty.

Gulogulo37

October 22nd, 2017 at 6:55 AM ^

Kugler has been fine but not great. Cole is good, but he's kind of playing out of position. He's definitely not an elite left tackle. Those guys are definitely replaceable. 

Why couldn't it be McCaffery or Peters? If it's Speight, I think it'll be him over better competition than he faced this spring and summer.

"our defense probably isn't going to be better." Why would only the safeties improve? Our CBs are first-year starters. McCray is going to be replaced with a more athletic LB who was highly rated as a recruit and isn't a true freshman. Our DL will have an even more experienced Winovich, Gary, and Mone, not to mention we should have better depth.

That schedule basically looks the same as this year except we add ND. You're really worried about Nebraska and Northwestern? You realize we're in a Power 5 conference, right? 

TrueBlue2003

October 22nd, 2017 at 3:09 PM ^

it's highly unlikley a true soph C that won't play this year is going to be better than fine next year. Fine would be good. And if you think any tackle on our roster can step up and be better than good, or even close to good, given the mess that's competing for OT this year, you're just not being realistic.